Soapbox for a midget Aussie

Reason #532 Why The Cairns Post Sucks


By kaitee - Posted on 10 February 2009

The Cairns Post created somewhat of a shit storm recently when it reported on a woman who had the audacity to complain about having to pay for two seats on an plane because she was rather more than average in size.

 

Crowing that their report had made international headlines and had been the subject of much debate on their website after the original story was printed, it seems like The Cairns Post feel they've done journalism proud.

 

Bollocks.

 

The opening paragraph in the original story, about an overweight woman who paid for two seats on a plane only to find that they were on opposite sides of the plane, begins thus:  "A Cairns woman says there is a fat chance she'll fly with Jetstar again after she claims she was discriminated against for being overweight". A fat chance? A FAT CHANCE? This is supposed to be a news article, not a sly dig at someone's personal situation by a cheeky pun. I'm going to chalk up one nomination for "Low of The Year" for that disgustingly unprofessional intro.

 

The follow-up article where TCP praises themselves for breaking such a successful story was titled "Samantha a Big Hit". Once again, TCP tries to make a pun on an unfortunate personal situation.

 

I never bothered to watch the Fox segment, but after following the story for several days it became clear that Samantha's actual issue with Jetstar was not that she was forced to pay for two seats (in the original story it mentions she had discussions with Jetstar staff regarding this policy, so she was obviously not unaware of it), but that Jetstar had said they would work around the issue and then reneged on their stance and asked her to pay for a 2nd seat and then in a fit of genius allocated that seat somewhere else on the plane.

 

The comments on the original story made me want to punch my computer screen in anger (but I didn't because it's shiny and big and expensive). Most of them were in the vein of "lose some weight you fatty bitch/fatties r gross n i hate sitting nxt 2 dem on da plane ew lose wt!" and calling for Samantha to stop complaining and get on a treadmill, all of which miss the point of the article (the two seats being in different sections of the plane) and completely disregard the fact that there are many other reasons for obesity that have nothing to do with being a lazy cow who scoffs cheeseburgers all day (diabetes, thyroid disease, etc). Some comments were insightful, well thought out and not inflammatory, but the majority made me disgusted at the ridiculous amount of intolerance people have.

 

As a frequent flyer, I can well attest to the fact that Jetstar have very screwy policies. They've screwed me for scandalous baggage fees at one leg of my trip and then not a cent extra on the return leg. They're also late 100% of the time when I flew with them. Unfortunately at the time for me, being on minimum wage and in a long distance relationship with George I couldn't exactly afford to fly with any other airline. Catching a flight that should arrive at 11.30pm isn't fun at the best of times but is especially un-fun when you arrive at 3am. Another time they completely cancelled my 7pm return flight and put me on a 6am flight instead, effectively cutting short my holiday by an entire day (and that was the ONLY flight option to return that day so I had to accept it). While it's an unfortunate situation for Samantha, it's also nice to see that I'm not the only one that Jetstar have fucked around.

 

Enough paying out on Jetstar however, let's get back to talking about how stupid The Cairns Post is. I'd be taking The Cairns Post to the anti-discrimination tribunal for that introduction.

 

 

It was in the follow up story that I realised that I knew of this person. Similar stories have been published about this large transgender person who seems to have a penchant for inciting sensationalism. But I must agree that the idea of the seats being separate should be the central theme. This case could wind up as the thin edge of the wedge as airlines may start to charge all passengers for total weight. i.e. allow total weight for passenger and their luggage. Lets just say average person 80kg(har har) plus 20kg for luggage then the fare will reflect 100kg. If you and luggage are say 160kg then expect to pay for 60kg of extra charge. Aferall it cost per kg to get a plane up in the air.

There was a time not to long ago when every headline in TCP was a bad pun of some movie title.

On the good news front there is a new editor this week at TCP so we may get to see a rise in quality from this paper.

It (TCP) did report in an article about the "blow up bandit" by Damon Guppy not once but twice that the burglar broke into the building and climbed down 15 metres. Well how? I am sure that the building is not 15 metres high.

I did see that they have a new editor and my immediate first hope was for some writing and ethical standards to be introduced. I don't know whether I should hold my breath or not though.

 

I don't agree with the airlines charging fares according to weight either, as some likely anorexic and mostly illiterate people suggested in their comments. That penalises a lot of people who aren't necessarily large enough to require two seats to themselves, like tall people, athletes, pregnant women, etc.

 

I want to give a reply to the first article which does not have the post-comment option. Hope it is ok. As you expressed your "feelings" about smokers, I also have a contradictory oppinion (as a smoker). I posted that also on my blog http://infowebexplore.blogspot.com . I do not really understand what is your problem if someone is addicted to tabacco, drugs, etc. You should praise God that you do not experience such troubles. The nonsmokers complain continuously due to the fact that they are disturbed, but whose fault is that? The governs, companies should forbidden the release of the addicting stuff. By human nature we are curious to different kind of temptation we can not get rid of later on. There are millions of smokers on the earth, all of them must be the scum of society? I decided by myself to be a smoker and do not constrain anyone to do so, i would like to quit but it's not so simple for everyone. I think you should try to be impartial and furthermore to find out the oppinion of the real smokers (not those who do it just to be cool). If there is lot of pollution, that is not caused mainly by the smokers for sure.
Good luck.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options



User login

Navigation

Recent comments